Mentoring Practice Reviews

In addition to reviewing programs, the National Mentoring Resource Center Research Board reviews the evidence base for different mentoring practices (i.e., specific sets of tasks or strategies for implementing some component of a mentoring program). These practice reviews are conducted using a customized process similar to, but distinct from, the CrimeSolutions.gov program reviews. Many of these practices can be implemented in a variety of program models and settings.

For each practice, we offer a detailed description of the practice and its evidence base as well as links to resources that can help practitioners implement or adapt the practice for their own programs. Practices are rated for effectiveness using the following key:

Effective

Program has strong evidence that it achieves justice-related goals when implemented with fidelity.

Promising

Program has some evidence that it achieves justice-related goals when implemented with fidelity.

No Effects

Program has strong evidence that it did not achieve justice-related goals (or had harmful effects).

Insufficient Research

Some relevant research may be available but is inconclusive. More research is needed to determine effectiveness.

Learn more about the review process for programs, practices, and resources.
You can also nominate additional programs, practices, and resources for review and inclusion on this site.